CONTACT
YOUR STATE REPs
 

______________________________________

"When you say fiscal responsibility, it seems to me that you really mean rich people keeping their money." --- Alice Adams

______________________________________

 

UnionVoiceSidebar1

PREVIOUS CALLS TO BOYCOTT

Riki Hing asked what the status was on previous calls for boycotts against Whole Foods and Starbucks. So we did a few emails/ a little googling and this is what we have.

STARBUCKS... back in 2005 or so there were some claims that Starbucks was firing people for being pro-union. These seem to have died down and unionization continues to grow. The latest issue in 2007 was about managers taking a cut of worker's tips. This was brought to court and found in favor of the workers. So as far as I can see, we do not have an active boycott of Starbucks...if any knows differently, let us know.

WHOLE FOODS -- the big issue with Whole Foods was with the Chairman of the Board using his influence to try and kill public healthcare in this country. The pressure of the boycott caused him to resign as Chairman but he is still the CEO of Whole Foods. The ancillary issues are that Whole Foods is non-union and is one of the big box stores that comes in with the look of local produce but it's not, undercuts the local grocery stores and pushes them out of business.... lesson is know where the owners of your stores live and then buy local, buy local, buy local.

______________________________________

We're in the process of completing a look at the Union districts and Steward/District Contact assignments. We're hoping to have a new Stewards page up and running by the beginning of September.

______________________________________

 "People at Bear Stearns get tens of millions for doing a terrible job at manipulating financial markets. And people get minimum wage for taking care of our grandparents." Barry Blueston

______________________________________

 

 

News Tidbits

Listserve Changes

Some of you may be aware that the Union has two listserves. They are the Voice listserve and the Unitmember listserve. Most of you are most familiar with the Unitmember listserve. It is the one that you subscribe to and can post emails to yourself. TheVoice listserve was originally adopted to send out notifications of the Union Voice, the union electronic newsletter. The Voice listserve has the most complete list of member emails.

We have decided that we will now use the Voice listserve for all formal union communications, i.e. Union announcements, the Union Voice, other formal union communications. This is not a listserve that the membership can post to themselves. If there is an announcement that a member wants to post to the Voice listserve because of its importance and needs a wide readership, they can send the email in question to Donna Johnson for consideration.

The unitmember listserve will continue to run the way it always has with the same guidelines. Members can now decide whether they want to receive these emails or not without worrying that they will not receive important Union communications.

We also want to remind people that they can decide to use their home email addresses for either or both of these listserves.

We hope people will find this change in process to be a beneficial one for all. If you have any questions, please email usa@external.umass.edu.

Donna Johnson
President

Old Union Voice Editions
Visitors:
web counter
LABOR HEROES

Dan Clawson

Local Labor Hero

Review of Prof. Clawson's 2003 book "The Next Upsurge":

"The U.S. labor movement may be on the verge of massive growth, according to Dan Clawson. He argues that unions don't grow slowly and incrementally, but rather in bursts. Even if the AFL-CIO could organize twice as many members per year as it now does, it would take thirty years to return to the levels of union membership that existed when Ronald Reagan was elected president. In contrast, labor membership more than quadrupled in the years from 1934 to 1945. For there to be a new upsurge, Clawson asserts, labor must fuse with social movements concerned with race, gender, and global justice. The new forms may create a labor movement that breaks down the boundaries between "union" and "community" or between work and family issues. Clawson finds that this is already happening in some parts of the labor movement: labor has endorsed global justice and opposed war in Iraq, student activists combat sweatshops, unions struggle for immigrant rights. Innovative campaigns of this sort, Clawson shows, create new strategies—determined by workers rather than union organizers—that redefine the very meaning of the labor movement. The Next Upsurge presents a range of examples from attempts to replace "macho" unions with more feminist models to campaigns linking labor and community issues and attempts to establish cross-border solidarity and a living wage."

Eugene V. Debs

Eugene V. Debs began working in the railroad shops in his hometown of Terre Haute, Indiana, as a young man. Debs served as a national union officer, an elected city official and an Indiana legislator before 1893 when he launched the American Railway Union, an industrial union of railroad workers. After serving time in prison for his participation in the Pullman Strike of 1894, Debs emerged with two unbendable beliefs: industrial u

nions rather than trade unions gave the workers the power needed to combat America's corporati

ons, and for him, Socialism was the best political choice for workers.

Debs fought tirelessly for then "radical" workers' rights now considered standard, workmen's compensation, pensions and social security, and for social causes including women's suffrage. He helped found the Industrial Workers of the World along with Big Bill Haywood and Mother Mary Harris Jones in 1905, but soon withdrew from that movement. Debs ran five times as a Socialist Party presidential candidate, from 1900-1920. His last campaign was run from a federal prison in Atlanta, where he served 32 months of a 10-year sentence for violating The Espionage Act, by publicly opposing America's involvement in World War I. Even so, Debs received nearly a million votes.

(Note: the Debs portrait photo was taken outside of the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary.)www.anchoreducationfoundation.org/images/Heroes.pdf

 ____________________

Cesar Chavez, 1927-1993

United Farm Workers

"It's ironic that those who till the soil, cultivate and harvest the fruits, vegetables and other foods that fill your tables with abundance have nothing left for themselves."

 

Born in 1927 to Mexican immigrant parents in Yuma, Arizona, Cesar Chavez began toiling in the fields as a young boy. In 1939, his family moved to California and like migrant workers throughout the country, followed the harvests up and down the state. In 1952, Cesar Chavez began working for the Community Service Organization, conducting voter registration drives and battling racial and economic discrimination against Chicanos. However, his passion and commitment belonged to those working in the fields, and in 1962, Chavez founded the National Farm Workers Association, which became the United Farm Workers Organizing Committee (UFW) within the AFL-CIO in 1965.

Building upon his Catholic upbringing and his adherence to the teachings of Gandhi and the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., Chavez successfully brought together religious organizations, labor unions, students, minority organizations, and consumers in a fiveyear grape boycott. His efforts turned the nation's attention to the dismal working conditions of the farm workers. In 1975, California Governor Jerry Brown signed the Agricultural Labor Relations Act, a collective bargaining law for farm workers. By the early 1980s, tens of thousands of farm workers were under UFW contracts, and realized higher pay, family health coverage, pension benefits, and other protections.

www.anchoreducationfoundation.org/images/Heroes.pdf



Search our website

This search function does not search the Contract PDF file. If your search does not show what you want, try opening the Contract page above and search the PDF.

« America is not Broke! | Main | OF, BY and FOR the PEOPLE »
Tuesday
Aug032010

op ed: To Dunkin or Not to Dunkin

Last week we got an email from Donna that asked us to boycott Dunkin Donuts because the company was being uncooperative in coming to a labor agreement. I forwarded it on to you all in the membership but didn’t think too much of it because I don’t go to Dunkin Donuts too much.

But this weekend, I was sitting on the steps of my deck, eating my breakfast cereal , getting ready to leave to visit a friend and it became a topic of concern. See I don’t drink coffee often as it bothers my system but I love it! When there’s a special occasion or event, I do decide to treat myself. This day I was going off to visit a friend which involved a 2 hour drive. As a treat, I had planned to take a cup of coffee on the drive.  AND because I have it so rarely, when I do have a cup I want one I know I’m going to like. And that’s a Dunkin Donuts’ “medium decaf light with sugar please.” I always get it at Dunkin Donuts because I can count on a guaranteed good cup of coffee. I know I’ll like it and I’ll enjoy it.

So here I am, caught in the dilemma of whether I should get my coffee at Dunkin or not. The inner mind battle begins….

“I know I’ll like it if I get it at Dunkin and I don’t get them often.”

“Yes, but labor is trying to prove a point here, Aggie.”

“Maybe but if I get a coffee at one of the other stores, it’s a crap shoot as to what it will be like. Maybe have to get Mexican Sumatran decaf…yuk!”

“Suck it up and do the right thing!”


And so I went back and forth and back and forth. Until the grandmother of all doubts and questions flowed through my mind, “What difference is my one little cup of coffee going to make anyways?”

And just as quick as that thought went through my mind another came right out too, “The difference is that YOU will be different.” It was really quite startling to hear this and to realize the wisdom in it. How would I be different? As I sat there thinking about it, I realized a few things. One, being part of a Union or a Labor Movement has to do with loss. We forget that. We’ve been so fortunate as we still enjoy many of the benefits that were won for us by our parents, grandparents, immigrants, women and children of years gone by. We go to the bargaining table expecting the other side to see the rightness of what we’re asking for and just give us what we want without “me” having to do anything, certainly not to lose anything. And the result of that naïveté is the erosion of the labor movement and unions in general.

The forgoing of personal gain for something larger than ourselves is an exercise we rarely do anymore. Yet it is the fundamental expression of solidarity.

As I drove past the Dunkin Donuts and stopped at the Shelburne Falls Coffee Roaters on Route 2 and did indeed get a medium decaf (Mexican Sumatran) and added lots of half and half and sugar to make it tasty, I reminded myself that this was such a small loss but was important for me to make…for myself! It’s kind of like waking up realizing all those things I thought I needed, I don’t need. That there’s a strength in me that I can count on. I want to nourish that strength. I want to get to the same place our ancestors once stood. There were no guarantees that they were going to get what they wanted. No guarantees that they wouldn’t lose and lose big.  I remember my father going out on strike at Uniroyal in Chicopee and being out of work for 9 months waiting for a contract to be settled in a way that was fair and gave them a better life. Our family went without pay and scrimped by but they fought for the principle, for the strength they knew they had as long as they stood together.

Nowadays it seems we only risk what we’re sure we have to, only make demands that we’re sure we can win, and above all don’t do anything that might cost ourselves something. I’m troubled by it. I don’t see us ever making true headway this way. Willingness to sacrifice, to suffer, to lose some ground to make real progress is a way of labor relations we need to remember, practice and use as a tool.

But if there are only a handful of people in the union or on campus that are willing to throw down the gauntlet, we’ll keep going the way we have, losing more of our income each year, more work and less benefits, slinking our way to retirement hoping we’ll escape the worst of it.  

We’re coming into a new academic year. Wouldn’t it be great to go to a Union Meeting and see the room filled to capacity? Hear our collective voices telling Donna, “We’re ready to do what it takes.” To feel each other’s pain and difficulties and share them rather than try to make ourselves so small so no one will notice us until we can leave? Let’s do this for ourselves! Let’s become an incredible force to be reckoned with! You willing?

Aggie Mitchkoski

Reader Comments (1)

Aggie, thank you for delivering such a powerful reminder of the significance of a single action. Shared sacrifice and a willingness to think beyond my own needs, has never left me feeling deprived.

You are, being the change you envision!

August 19, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJim Plaza

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>